Why People are Atypical Agents

Philosophical Papers 31 (1):87-116 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I argue that the traditional philosophical approach of taking cognitively and emotionally competent adult people to be the prototypical instances of agency should be revised in light of current work in the behavioral sciences. Logical consistency in application is better served by taking simple goal-directed and feedback-governed systems such as insects as the prototypes of the concept of agency, with people being agents ?by extension? in the same sense as countries or corporations

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Zombies Incorporated.Olof Leffler - 2023 - Theoria 89 (5):640-659.
Bio-Agency and the Possibility of Artificial Agents.Anne Sophie Meincke - 2018 - In Antonio Piccolomini D’Aragona, Martin Carrier, Roger Deulofeu, Axel Gelfert, Jens Harbecke, Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Lara Huber, Peter Hucklenbroich, Ludger Jansen, Elizaveta Kostrova, Keizo Matsubara, Anne Sophie Meincke, Andrea Reichenberger, Kian Salimkhani & Javier Suárez (eds.), Philosophy of Science: Between the Natural Sciences, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 65-93.
Responsible Agency and the Importance of Moral Audience.Anneli Jefferson & Katrina Sifferd - 2023 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (3):361-375.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
53 (#99,339)

6 months
23 (#666,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Minds, brains, and programs.John Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Real patterns.Daniel C. Dennett - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):27-51.

View all 29 references / Add more references