The Austin-Malcolm argument for the incorrigibility of perceptual reports

Dialectica 33 (1):59-75 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1746-8361.1979.tb01520.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Austin‐Malcolm Argument for the Incorrigibility of Perceptual Reports.Gerald Doppelt - 1979 - Dialectica 33 (1):59-75.
Malcolm's dreaming.K. Stern - 1959 - Analysis 19 (December):44-46.
The electroencephalogram argument against incorrigibility.Gregory Sheridan - 1969 - American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1):62-70.
Austin on incorrigibility.John E. Atwell - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (December):261-266.
Mistaking sensations.Kathryn Pyne Parsons - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (April):201-213.
Malcolm on 'remembering that'.S. Jack Odell - 1971 - Mind 80 (October):593.
A note on factual memory.Stanley Munsat - 1965 - Philosophical Studies 16 (3):33-39.
Malcolm on impure memory.Eric Stiffler - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 38 (October):299-304.
Chisholm's Grand Move.Mark Kaplan - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (5):563-581.
Memory.Don Locke - 1971 - Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#293,398)

6 months
9 (#355,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The given element in empirical knowledge.C. I. Lewis - 1952 - Philosophical Review 61 (2):168-175.

Add more references