"Shipwrecked with the Aid of Repentance": Sin, Ethics and Normativity in Kant and Kierkegaard

Dissertation, University of California, Irvine (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main thesis of my dissertation is that Kierkegaard's category of "the ethical" is an analogue for Kantian morality. Consequently, Kierkegaard's criticisms of the ethical can profitably be read as criticisms of Kant. Kierkegaard's objection to Kant is two-fold. First, he argues that Kant's account suffers from a 'foundational gap' in that morality is unable to find what it will count as a rational foundation for its norms. This foundational gap is a product of Kant's 'strong responsibility requirement'; the claim that an individual is only bound by the principles to which she chooses to give motivational efficacy. The second criticism is that because of the foundational gap, morality must make reference to religious concepts that are ultimately destructive of the central presuppositions of morality. ;I begin with an examination of Kant's Reciprocity Thesis---the claim that morality and freedom reciprocally imply each other. I argue for an existentialist reading of this thesis, which holds that a free individual ought to submit to moral norms because this is the only way to give an authentic expression of her freedom. Using the strong responsibility requirement, I argue that one can't give a reason in favor of morality because in choosing to allow moral norms to be authoritative the individual is at the same time choosing what will count for him as a reason. ;In subsequent chapters I explore how this foundational gap manifests itself in Kant's claim that morality leads inevitably to religion, concluding with Kant's claim that a commitment to morality requires divine aid to assist the moral agent in satisfying the demands of morality. This violates Kant's strong responsibility requirement, and thus calls Kant's conception of morality into question. ;The final chapters turn to an examination of Kierkegaard, and argue that his investigation of the category of the ethical can also be seen as an investigation of Kantian morality. I conclude by arguing that for Kierkegaard the foundational gap can only be resolved by abandoning the attempt to ground moral norms in reason, and instead ground them in the personal relationship an individual cultivates with God

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,078

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant on Virtue and Justice.Faviola Rivera-Castro - 1999 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Kant’s religious ethics: the ineluctable link between morality and theism.Raymond E. Perrier - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 89 (1):3-24.
Kant, Skepticism, and Moral Sensibility.Owen Ware - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Toronto
Kant’s Deductions of Morality and Freedom.Owen Ware - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):116-147.
Politics and morality in Habermas' discourse ethics.Gulshan Khan - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (2):149-168.
Kantian Ethics: After Darwin.John Teehan - 2003 - Zygon 38 (1):49-60.
Hegel's Critique of Kantian Morality.Kam-lun Kwong - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia
Vindicating Kant’s Morality.Robert Arp - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):5-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian Duckles
San Diego Mesa College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references