- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: Claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness
Artificial Intelligence 324 (C):104011 (2023)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view.Wolfgang Dvořák & Stefan Woltran - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 285 (C):103290.
The complexity landscape of claim-augmented argumentation frameworks.Wolfgang Dvořák, Alexander Greßler, Anna Rapberger & Stefan Woltran - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence 317 (C):103873.
A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation.Lixing Tan, Zhaohui Zhu & Jinjin Zhang - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence 315 (C):103836.
On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance.P. Baroni, P. E. Dunne & M. Giacomin - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (3-4):791-813.
On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method.Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin & Beishui Liao - 2014 - Artificial Intelligence 212 (C):104-115.
SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics.Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin & Giovanni Guida - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence 168 (1-2):162-210.
Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks.Ofer Arieli - 2012 - In Luis Farinas del Cerro, Andreas Herzig & Jerome Mengin (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 28--40.
On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics.Pietro Baroni & Massimiliano Giacomin - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (10-15):675-700.
On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: The hidden power of argumentation semantics.Ringo Baumann, Wolfgang Dvořák, Thomas Linsbichler, Christof Spanring, Hannes Strass & Stefan Woltran - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence 241 (C):244-284.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-09-22
Downloads
8 (#1,335,493)
6 months
6 (#702,272)
2023-09-22
Downloads
8 (#1,335,493)
6 months
6 (#702,272)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Attack semantics and collective attacks revisited.Martin Caminada, Matthias König, Anna Rapberger & Markus Ulbricht - forthcoming - Argument and Computation:1-77.
References found in this work
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms.Martin Caminada & Leila Amgoud - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (5-6):286-310.
On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics.Pietro Baroni & Massimiliano Giacomin - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (10-15):675-700.
Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: Postulates and properties.Nikos Gorogiannis & Anthony Hunter - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (9-10):1479-1497.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo