Who's afraid of a non-adaptable constitution?

IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research 9 (1):26-27 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Joseph Raz criticizes John Rawls for a procedure supporting a non-adaptable constitution. This paper considers how a non-adaptable constitution can seem not so counterintuitive and also when.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

8. Academic Freedom and the Constitution.Robert Post - 2015 - In Akeel Bilgrami & Jonathan R. Cole (eds.), Who's Afraid of Academic Freedom? Cambridge University Press. pp. 123-152.
Baker on Human Personhood.Eugene Mills - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Research 40:473-481.
Unity and Constitution of Social Entities.Ludger Jansen - 2009 - In Benedikt Schick, Edmund Runggaldier & Ludger Honnefelder (eds.), Unity and Time in Metaphysics. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 15-45.
Loops, Constitution and Cognitive Extension.S. Orestis Palermos - 2014 - Cognitive Systems Research 27:25-41.
Understanding the Non-Legalized Constitution.Mark Tushnet - 1998 - Law and Philosophy 17 (2):193-202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-23

Downloads
106 (#170,129)

6 months
71 (#74,424)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The morality of freedom.J. Raz - 1988 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (1):108-109.

Add more references