Inventive thinking in the humanities

Common Knowledge 23 (1):1-18 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay's central concern is the need for a new, practical dimension in the humanities, emphasizing their constructive rather than purely scholarly aspects. An analysis is offered of various types of inventions in the fields of linguistics, philosophy, art, and literature, such as new disciplines, genres, cultural practices, and intellectual movements. An invention is not the production of a given work, however great, but rather a principle or technique that can be applied to the production of many works by others. Following Francis Bacon's call for the invention of new arts and sciences, the essay outlines new disciplines: technohumanities, which would study humans as a part of the technosphere; pathohumanities, which would investigate the self-destructive mechanisms of civilization; and scriptorics, which would focus on Homo scriptor, who has survived “the death of the author.” A research and educational program, uniting major fields of the humanities, is proposed: PILLAR would be a transdisciplinary strategy complementary to STEM, integrating scholarship and inventorship.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-22

Downloads
23 (#160,613)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mikhail Epstein
Emory University

Citations of this work

The critic as human being.Adir H. Petel - 2017 - Common Knowledge 23 (1):19-56.
Pensar (no solo) las humanidades.Sonia RiverterBañón - 2018 - Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía 45:145-166.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references