Names, numbers and indentations: A guide to post-linnaean taxonomy

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (2):361-383 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The vast majority of biological taxonomists use the Linnaean system when constructing classifications. Taxa are assigned Linnaean ranks and taxon names are devised according to the Linnaean rules of nomenclature. Unfortunately, the Linnaean system has become theoretically outdated. Moreover, its continued use causes a number of practical problems. This paper begins by sketching the ontological and practical problems facing the Linnaean system. Those problems are sufficiently pressing that alternative systems of classification should be investigated. A number of proposals for an alternative system are introduced and evaluated. The best aspects of those proposals are brought together to form a post-Linnaean system, and a comparison of the Linnaean and post-Linnaean systems is conducted. The final section of this paper considers not only the theoretical reasons for replacing the Linnaean system, but also the practical feasibility of adopting an alternative system.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Collection and collation: theory and practice of Linnaean botany.Staffan Müller-Wille - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):541-562.
The evolution of the linnaean hierarchy.Marc Ereshefsky - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):493-519.
Linnaean ranks: Vestiges of a bygone era.Marc Ereshefsky - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S305-S315.
Necessary propertes and linnaean essentialism.Berent Enç - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):83-102.
Necessary Properties and Linnaean Essentialism.Berent Enç - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):83 - 102.
Causes, kinds and forms.Gerry Webster - 1993 - Acta Biotheoretica 41 (4):275-287.
Some problems with the linnaean hierarchy.Marc Ereshefsky - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):186-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#242,352)

6 months
13 (#185,383)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marc Ereshefsky
University of Calgary

Citations of this work

Classes or Individuals? The Paradox of Systematics Revisited.Alessandro Rapini - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (4):675-695.
Classes or Individuals? The Paradox of Systematics Revisited.Alessandro Rapini - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (4):675-695.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Species.Philip Kitcher - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):308-333.
Eliminative pluralism.Marc Ereshefsky - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):671-690.
Species pluralism and anti-realism.Marc Ereshefsky - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (1):103-120.

View all 11 references / Add more references