Names, numbers and indentations: A guide to post-linnaean taxonomy


Authors
Marc Ereshefsky
University of Calgary
Abstract
The vast majority of biological taxonomists use the Linnaean system when constructing classifications. Taxa are assigned Linnaean ranks and taxon names are devised according to the Linnaean rules of nomenclature. Unfortunately, the Linnaean system has become theoretically outdated. Moreover, its continued use causes a number of practical problems. This paper begins by sketching the ontological and practical problems facing the Linnaean system. Those problems are sufficiently pressing that alternative systems of classification should be investigated. A number of proposals for an alternative system are introduced and evaluated. The best aspects of those proposals are brought together to form a post-Linnaean system, and a comparison of the Linnaean and post-Linnaean systems is conducted. The final section of this paper considers not only the theoretical reasons for replacing the Linnaean system, but also the practical feasibility of adopting an alternative system.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S1369-8486(01)00004-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,984
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Species.Philip Kitcher - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):308-333.
Eliminative Pluralism.Marc Ereshefsky - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):671-690.
Species Pluralism and Anti-Realism.Marc Ereshefsky - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (1):103-120.
Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis.Joel Cracraft - 1983 - In R. F. Johnston (ed.), Current Ornithology. Plenum Press. pp. 159-87.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Classes or Individuals? The Paradox of Systematics Revisited.Alessandro Rapini - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 35 (4):675-695.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Collection and Collation: Theory and Practice of Linnaean Botany.Staffan Müller-Wille - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (3):541-562.
The Evolution of the Linnaean Hierarchy.Marc Ereshefsky - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):493-519.
Linnaean Ranks: Vestiges of a Bygone Era.Marc Ereshefsky - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S305-S315.
Necessary Propertes and Linnaean Essentialism.Berent Enc - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):83-102.
Necessary Properties and Linnaean Essentialism.Berent Enç - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):83 - 102.
Causes, Kinds and Forms.Gerry Webster - 1993 - Acta Biotheoretica 41 (4):275-287.
Some Problems with the Linnaean Hierarchy.Marc Ereshefsky - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):186-205.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
34 ( #213,904 of 2,319,412 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #435,784 of 2,319,412 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature