Fairbairn's reply to the comments of Balint, Foulkes, and Sutherland

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (28):333-338 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comments on Fairbairn's paper.S. H. Foulkes - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (28):324-329.
Some comments on dr Fairbairn's paper.J. D. Sutherland - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (28):329-333.
Some Comments on Fairbairn's Paper.J. D. Sutherland - 1957 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (28):329-333.
Reply to note by W. P. D. Wightman.W. Mays - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (44):336.
Reply to note by W. P. D. Wightman.W. Mays - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (44):336-336.
John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn.Adam Stewart - 2010 - Newman Studies Journal 7 (2):6-17.
Criticism of Fairbairn's generalisation about object-relations.Michael Balint - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (28):323-324.
A reply to 'some new aspects of relativity: Comments on Zahar's paper'.Arthur I. Miller - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):252-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#210,565)

6 months
12 (#306,076)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references