The Spontaneous Generation Controversy (1859-1880): British and German Reactions to the Problem of Abiogenesis [Book Review]

Journal of the History of Biology 5 (2):285 - 319 (1972)
The controversy over spontaneous generation and the theory of evolution was part of the broader issue of the nature of life. It was the vitalists, who had originally accepted the doctrine of heterogenesis, who now were forced to reject abiogenesis. Their commitment to the view that life was unique and autonomous was so strong that, once the link between evolution and the abiogenetic origin of life had been made, they were almost constrained to reject evolution. It is not surprising that one finds this extreme position among German scientists, for it was only in Germany that the strong connection had been made. In Britain, with its strong empirical tradition, the theory of evolution was never completely tied to the doctrine of abiogenesis.Many nonvitalistic biologists were equally committed to the view that there was a gradation between the living and the nonliving, and saw in the doctrine of evolution a vindication of these views. To many of this school, abiogenesis was an a priori necessity requiring no empirical proof. If they sought for any empirical justification for their views on abiogenesis, one feels that such proof was never of great importance to them. Many—particularly the Germans—regarded those who denied abiogenesis because of the lack of proof to be guilty of following an outdated methodology: “that modern scientists still put so uncommon value on the inductive proof of spontaneous generation, is the clearest indication that few place confidence in the first principle of the theory of knowledge.” To them an acceptance of abiogenesis was necessary “in order to understand nature according to the laws of causality.” 105
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00346661
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,511
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Wolffian Roots of Kant’s Teleology.Hein van den Berg - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):724-734.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Children, Teachers and Society: The Over-Pressure Controversy, 1880-1886.A. B. Robertson - 1972 - British Journal of Educational Studies 20 (3):315 - 323.
Boyle on Seminal Principles.R. P. - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):597-630.
The Problem of Biological Individuality.Ellen Clarke - 2010 - Biological Theory 5 (4):312-325.
Spontaneous Generation And Creation.William J. Schmitt - 1962 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):269-287.
Essays on Kant, Schelling, and German Aesthetics.Henry Crabb Robinson - 2010 - Modern Humanities Research Association.
Periodicals and Controversy.Bernard Lightman - 2011 - Spontaneous Generations 5 (1):5-11.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
12 ( #383,118 of 2,180,740 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #300,627 of 2,180,740 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums