Authors
Joseph Fins
Cornell University
Franklin Miller
Columbia University
Abstract
: This response to Lynn Jansen's critique of clinical pragmatism concentrates on two themes: (1) contrasting approaches to moral epistemology and (2) the connection between theory and practice in clinical ethics. Particular attention is paid to the status of principles and the role of consensus, with some closing speculations on how Dewey might view the current state of bioethics
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.1998.0001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
20 ( #555,045 of 2,498,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes