Three arguments against prescription requirements

Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):579-586 (2012)

Authors
Jessica Flanigan
University of Richmond
Abstract
In this essay, I argue that prescription drug laws violate patients' rights to self-medication. Patients have rights to self-medication for the same reasons they have rights to refuse medical treatment according to the doctrine of informed consent (DIC). Since we should accept the DIC, we ought to reject paternalistic prohibitions of prescription drugs and respect the right of self-medication. In section 1, I frame the puzzle of self-medication; why don't the same considerations that tell in favour of informed consent also justify a right of self-medication? In section 2, I show that the prescription drug system was historically motivated by paternalism. In section 3, I outline the justifications for the DIC in more detail. I show that consequentialist, epistemic, and deontic considerations justify the DIC. In sections 4–6, I argue that these considerations also justify rights of self-medication. I then propose that rights of self-medication require non-prohibitive prescription policies in section 7. I consider two objections in sections 8 and 9: that patients ought not to make medically risky or deadly decisions, and that unrestricted access to prescription-grade pharmaceuticals would result in widespread misuse and abuse. Section 10 concludes
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2011-100240
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,327
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Sources of Normativity.Christine Korsgaard - 1996 - Mind 106 (424):791-794.
Methods and Principles in Biomedical Ethics.T. L. Beauchamp - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (5):269-274.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Using Informed Consent to Save Trust.Nir Eyal - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):437-444.
A Gentle Ethical Defence of Homeopathy.David Levy, Ben Gadd, Ian Kerridge & Paul A. Komesaroff - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (2):203-209.
Public Bioethics.Jessica Flanigan - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (2):170-184.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Commentary on 'Three Arguments Against Prescription Requirements'.A. Martin - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):588-589.
Prescription Requirements: A Reply to Taylor, Martin and Eyal.J. Flanigan - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):591-592.
Reconciling Informed Consent with Prescription Drug Requirements.N. Eyal - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):589-591.
The Scope of Rational Requirements.John Brunero - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):28-49.
How Does Coherence Matter?Niko Kolodny - 2007 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (1pt3):229 - 263.
Welfare, Work Requirements, and Dependant-Care.Elizabeth Anderson - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3):243-256.
Are There Process-Requirements of Rationality?Julian Fink - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (4):475-488.
Normative Requirements.John Broome - 1999 - Ratio 12 (4):398–419.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-07-29

Total views
111 ( #72,661 of 2,271,518 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #568,563 of 2,271,518 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature