Is the rule of law really indifferent to human rights?

Law and Philosophy 27 (6):533 - 581 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A broad range of scholars contend that the rule of law is indifferent to human rights. I call this view the "no-rights thesis," and attempt to unsettle it. My argument draws on the work of Lon L. Fuller and begins with the idea that the fundamental justification of the rule of law rests on a juridical conception of human agency, one that finds expression in the legal and moral claims that can arise from human agency within the context of legal relationships. I argue that the state and its legal subjects are in a particular kind of legal relationship with one another, a fiduciary relationship, and that the content of the state's ensuing fiduciary obligation is the rule of law. Because the rule of law is intelligible in terms of the right, and independently of the good, it follows that compliance with the rule of law necessarily makes a moral difference regardless of how poorly the state lives up to the demands of the good. This is a conceptual rather than an empirical claim, and it leads to the conclusion that respect for human agency in the context of the state-subject fiduciary relationship necessarily entails respect for human dignity, respect for human dignity entails respect for human rights, and therefore a commitment to the rule of law entails a commitment to human rights.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,215

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
83 (#148,750)

6 months
2 (#297,972)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Evan Fox-Decent
McGill University

Citations of this work

The Legality of Self‐Constitution.Christoph Hanisch - 2015 - Ratio Juris 28 (4):452-469.
Fuller's Internal Morality of Law.Kristen Rundle - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (9):499-506.
Indeterminacy, Ideology and Legitimacy in International Investment Arbitration: Controlling International Private Networks of Legal Governance?Juan J. Garcia Blesa - 2021 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (5):1967-1994.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references