Film theory

In Alison M. Jaggar & Iris Marion Young (eds.), A companion to feminist philosophy. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 353–360 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Feminist philosophy of film is a young field that is rapidly growing but that has as yet no distinct disciplinary presence within philosophy. Articles by feminist philosophers on film began appearing in aesthetics journals and anthologies in English only in the late 1980s and 1990s. In film studies, as in aesthetics more generally, disciplinary boundaries are fluid. Writers from many fields – literature, art, communications, cultural studies – make critical contributions on film, addressing philosophical issues and drawing upon philosophical theories. Many questions discussed in the general field of film theory are philosophical ones, and among these are topics important for feminist philosophy and aesthetics: Is film an art, and if so why? What is the essence of film? How does film depict subjectivity? What is the nature of our emotional reactions to and interest in film? How is the photographic nature of film used in constructing realistic or other forms of representations of the world? How is ideology at work in the Hollywood production system and in the circulation of filmic images in the popular culture industry? It would be not only difficult, but arbitrary and misleading, to restrict the label or practice of “feminist philosophy of film” to professional philosophers. It is best to approach this subject, then, by situating it in relation to other fields, including feminist film theory, film theory in general, philosophical work on film, and feminist aesthetics. Feminist philosophy of film is rapidly expanding as philosophers with diverse interests turn their attention to film. The inclusion of feminist essays by philosophers in two anthologies on film in the mid‐1990s, together with the appearance of the first issue of the journal Film and Philosophy, suggest that this field is on the brink of a period of rapid growth and change. I will discuss possible new directions of growth, and connections with feminist philosophy broadly considered in the conclusion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feminist Film Theory.C. Freeland - 1998 - In Michael Kelly (ed.), Encyclopedia of aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 2.
Feminist film theory on the brink of laughter.Maggie Hennefeld - 2022 - In Kyle Stevens (ed.), The Oxford handbook of film theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Film theory and philosophy.Richard Allen & Murray Smith (eds.) - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Studying Feminist Film Theory.Terri Murray - 2019 - Leighton Buzzard LU7, UK: Auteur Publications / Columbia University Press.
Some Philosophical Issues of Film Theory.Noel Edward Carroll - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago
Film theory and philosophy.Cynthia A. Freeland - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (1):144-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
14 (#1,019,271)

6 months
7 (#491,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cynthia Freeland
University of Houston

Citations of this work

Feminist Aesthetics.Carolyn Korsmeyer & Peg Weiser - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references