Vanilla Rules: the "No Ice Cream" Construction

Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung 27:209-227 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper is about what we call Deontically-flavored Nominal Constructions (DNCs) in English, such as "No ice cream" or "Dogs on leash only". DNCs are often perceived as commands and have been argued to be a type of non-canonical imperative, much like root infinitives in German or Russian. We argue instead that DNCs at their core are declaratives that cite a rule but can be used performatively in the right context. We propose that DNCs contain an elided deontic modal, i.e., allowed, whose presence explains their distributional restrictions and interpretational properties. Among other things, we speculate on the licensing conditions of DNCs (the presence of 'only' or the negative determiner 'no'), suggesting that these are tied to the properties of discourses in which rules can be used naturally.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles Junivive - 2016 - Http://Neugarciniacambogiablog.Com/Junivive-Cream/ 26 ( Junivive Cream):22.
A Note on Harmony.Nissim Francez & Roy Dyckhoff - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):613-628.
Rules, Games, and Society.Martin A. Bertman - 2008 - Abstracta 4 (2):96-122.
Juicios de valor; racionalidad y reglas tecnológicas.Gustavo Acevedo - 1998 - Análisis Filosófico 18 (1):75-110.
Why do we need rules and laws?Jessica Pegis - 2017 - New York, NY: Crabtree Publishing Company.


Added to PP

173 (#112,742)

6 months
79 (#60,589)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references