What We Have Learned about Limiting Knowledge in a Democracy

Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (2):1013-1051 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aryeh Neier: The topic of this session is "What We Have Learned about Limiting Knowledge in a Democracy," and it says we should discuss "how should we proceed and where should lines be drawn?" I'm going to conduct a conversation in which I will focus on this question of limits. The panel is very distinguished, very diverse, and I think we ought to be able to anticipate a diversity of views. All of our speakers are people who promote freedom of information, but I am going to begin by asking them to reverse that role this evening. All of them, I assume, have certain limits they would impose on the availability of knowledge, and I'd like to know what those limits are, then see if there are some common threads or themes that we can extract from what they have to say.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Desires as Causes of Actions.David Pears - 1968 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 1:83-97.
Desires as Causes of Actions.David Pears - 1968 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 1:83-97.
The Art of Asking Questions.Leah M. McClimans - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (4):521-538.
Knowledge with Luck.HsinMei Lin - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 75:127-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-19

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references