H.O.T. Theory, Concepts, and Synesthesia: A Reply to Adams and Shreve

Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (4):443-448 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to Fred Adams and Charlotte Shreve’s (2016) paper entitled “What Can Synesthesia Teach Us about Higher Order Theories of Consciousness?”, previously published in Symposion, I argue that H.O.T. theory does have the resources to account for synesthesia and the specific worries that they advance in their paper, such as the relationship between concepts and experience and the ability to handle instances of ‘pop-out’ experiences.

Similar books and articles

What Can Synesthesia Teach Us About Higher Order Theories of Consciousness?Fred Adams & Charlotte Shreve - 2016 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (3):251-257.
Can Blue Mean Four?Jennifer Matey - 2014 - In Christopher Hill David Bennett (ed.), Sensory Integration and the Unity of Consciousness. MIT Press.
Does synesthesia undermine representationalism?Torin Alter - 2006 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 12.
Rethinking synesthesia.Michael Sollberger - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):171 - 187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-07

Downloads
407 (#51,569)

6 months
94 (#54,784)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rocco J. Gennaro
University of Southern Indiana

Citations of this work

What Can Synesthesia Teach Us About Higher Order Theories of Consciousness?Fred Adams & Charlotte Shreve - 2016 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (3):251-257.

Add more citations