Torture and Singularity

Public Affairs Quarterly 19 (3):163-176 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The attempts to justify torture tacitly assume that no person is a singular being. This assumption ignores the ontological and moral status of any human being as a singular subject, whose inner, psychical reality cannot be accessible from without, and whose value as a singular being is universal. Were torturers and those who attempt to justify them right, the categorical difference between objects and persons would be obliterated. Torturers also ignore the absolute moral rights of any person as a singular human being, however atrocious. In light of the principle that any person is a singular human being, I clarify in detail that inflicting torture is absolutely immoral. Torture fails to meet the universal test emerging from the singularity principle. (AN PHL2160254) Subjects: ETHICS; PERSON; SINGULARITY; TERRORISM; TORTURE

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Torture with consent.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2019 - Philosophical Pathways (230):1-3.
For Interrogational Torture.Stephen Kershnar - 2005 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2):223-241.
Torture and just war.Darrell Cole - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (1):26-51.
Torture: a touchstone for global social justice.Bob Brecher - 2011 - In Widdows N. Smith & H. (ed.), Global Social Justice. Routledge. pp. 90-101.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
15 (#947,808)

6 months
4 (#1,005,098)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Amihud Gilead
University of Haifa

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references