History and Theory 9 (1):3-36 (1970)

Abstract
Collingwood's well-known dicta about history and its practice are not expressions of a perverse idealism but are rooted in reflection on his own work as historian. The problem which informs his writings on history was to make sense of the discipline of history without opening the way to historical skepticism. The early view of his Speculum Mentis, rooted in an external philosophical stance and not in the actual practice of history, was actually skeptical. In his middle years he regarded history as the science of historical evidence, but this view left obscure the interest of history in the historical past. In his most mature view, as expressed in The Idea of History, Collingwood comes to see how the discipline of history, judged in terms of its own procedures and not by external norms imposed upon it from other sources, is able to make responsible knowledge claims and avoid the threat of skepticism. His well-known views about the historian's re-thinking past thought, the autonomy of history and the historical imagination all play roles to that end, and are entirely reasonable when it is understood what Collingwood intends by them. They are part of his theory of historical knowing, not of historical explanation
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2504500
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,825
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Making Sense of History: Skagestad on Popper and Collingwood.M. Hurup Nielsen & J. F. G. Shearmur - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):459-489.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Question of Evidence: A Study of R. G. Collingwood's Philosophy of History.Mark Joseph Kuhn - 1997 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Collingwood's Dialectic of History.Louis O. Mink - 1968 - History and Theory 7 (1):3-37.
Collingwood on Historical Authority and Historical Imagination.Dale Jacquette - 2009 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (1):55-78.
Collingwood, Oakeshott and Webb on the Historical Element in Religion.Ian Tregenza - 2007 - Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 13 (2):93-117.
Collingwood's Historical Principles at Work.Charles G. Salas - 1987 - History and Theory 26 (1):53-71.
Collingwood and the Idea of Progress.W. Jan van der Dussen - 1990 - History and Theory 29 (4):21.
Collingwood, Bradley, and Historical Knowledge.Robert M. Burns - 2006 - History and Theory 45 (2):178–203.
R.G. Collingwood's Definition of Historical Knowledge.R. B. Smith1 - 2007 - History of European Ideas 33 (3):350-371.
Physics and History. Winchester - 2008 - Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 14 (1):17-35.
History and the Primacy of Knowing.Leon J. Goldstein - 1977 - History and Theory 16 (4):29-52.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
20 ( #509,614 of 2,401,527 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,447 of 2,401,527 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes