In defence of an argument against truthmaker maximalism

Logic and Logical Philosophy 24 (1):105-109 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper analyses the argument proposed by Milne against truthmaker maximalism and shows that the objections raised to this argument by de Sa and Zardini, and Rodriguez-Pereyra are misguided because the first one misuses the vagueness of some terms; and the second one is based on a fallacy of petitio principii.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-04

Downloads
45 (#363,967)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jerzy Gołosz
Jagiellonian University

Citations of this work

Further Reflections on Sentences Saying of Themselves Strange Things.Elia Zardini - 2017 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 26 (4):563-581.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references