Apologising for the past: German science and nazi medicine

Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):31-42 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Recently, religious organisations, governments and public institutions have begun to offer apologies for historical wrongs. Can they legitimately do so? Departing from the tendency, Professor Hubert Markl, President of the Max Planck Society, has offered strong reasons for not apologising for the crimes of medical scientists who experimented on human subjects during the Nazi era. He argues that only the perpetrators can meaningfully apologise. Markl’'s position is considered and rejected in favour of the view that apologies by proxy for historical wrongs are justifiable and should be made by institutions that have the authority to do so.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,310

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

45 (#257,224)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Damian Grace
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Nicomachean Ethics.H. Aristotle & Rackham - 1968 - Harvard University Press.
Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 2006 - In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Moral Luck.Bernard Williams - 1976 - Philosophy 58 (226):544-548.
Nicomachean Ethics.Martin Aristotle & Ostwald - 1962 - Hackett Publishing Company.

View all 15 references / Add more references