«All the principles of being and becoming»: Schelling’s ontogenetic hypothesis

Rivista di Estetica 74:22-38 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Schelling’s Naturphilosophie was, from the outset, more concerned with ontogeny than ontology, i.e. not on what nature is but on what it does: ubiquitous creation. Therefore, the processes articulated in the Philosophy of Mythology remain instances of a philosophy driven by what might be called a post-naturalist naturalism. The two aims of this paper are, firstly, to demonstrate this nature-philosophical continuity throughout Schelling’s so-called Protean philosophical projects in order, secondly, to re-prepare Schellingian themes for current debates concerning ontology. To this end, I draw on the worldmaking and abundance postulates of Goodman and Feyerabend, respectively, to demonstrate the persistence of Schellingian ontogenetic pathways for remodelling process metaphysics for contemporary philosophy. Finally, the paper argues that the logical form of the hypothesis (antecedent and consequent) is itself consequent upon the ontogeny it hypothesises.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

El Alma Del Mundo En Schelling.Hugo Ochoa - 2006 - Hypnos. Revista Do Centro de Estudos da Antiguidade 16:17-31.
The epistemology of Schelling's philosophy of nature.Naomi Fisher - 2017 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 34 (3):271-290.
How Nature Comes to be Thought: Schelling's Paradox and the Problem of Location.Iain Hamilton Grant - 2013 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 44 (1):25-44.


Added to PP

39 (#419,517)

6 months
14 (#199,860)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Iain Grant
University of the West of England

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Comments.Nelson Goodman - 1966 - Journal of Philosophy 63 (11):328-331.

Add more references