Bioethics, the Ontology of Life, and the Hermeneutics of Biology

In Susi Ferrarello (ed.), Phenomenology of Bioethics: Technoethics and Lived Experience. Springer. pp. 1-21 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The phenomenological starting point of this paper is the world of the bioethical subject, the person engaged in moral deliberation about practices of intervention on living bodies. This paper develops a perspective informed by the hermeneutic tradition in phenomenology, approaching bioethical thinking as situated within specific contexts of meaning and conceptuality, frameworks through which the phenomena of the world are interpreted and made sense of by the reasoning subject. It focuses on one dimension of the hermeneutic world of contemporary bioethics, that of the relation between bioethics and biological science. This paper shows how taking a phenomenological-hermeneutic perspective can highlight an important but often overlooked way in which biology helps to structure spaces of bioethical sense-making, with substantive consequences for moral judgement. Bioscientific discourse provides us with interpretive resources for making sense of the living world around us and within us. Different interpretive resources reflect different assumptions about the ontology of living beings, humans included. Since, as is argued here, judgements about moral significance in bioethics can depend upon suppositions about the ontology of life, the way that scientific discourse interpretively constitutes the phenomena of life as intentional objects can thereby channel moral thinking in particular ways. The central thesis of this paper is that critical engagement with this ‘hermeneutics of biology’ is vital for contemporary bioethics. To illustrate, the paper explores the hermeneutic constitution of the genome and its relationship to issues of human identity in the context of genetic technology. Alternative interpretations of the genome—as ‘programme’ or as ‘developmental resource’—differently shape bioethical reasoning in this context. Choices of description in bioscience are in this way partly ethical questions, questions about how we ought to comport ourselves towards each other and the living world beyond.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Bioethical Approach to Abortion from Buddhist Vision of Emptiness.Yao-Ming Tsai - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 4:89-94.
Moral experience: a framework for bioethics research.M. R. Hunt & F. A. Carnevale - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11):658-662.
The self in the world: Overcoming classical dualism and shaping new landmarks.U. I. Lushch - 2018 - Антропологічні Виміри Філософських Досліджень 13:17-29.
Bioethical motifs in the literary work of Karel Čapek.Petr Jemelka - 2019 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 9 (3-4):168-180.
The Bioethical Dimension of Maturana's Thought.R. Mascolo - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (3):370-380.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-09

Downloads
5 (#1,558,750)

6 months
2 (#1,445,278)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jack Owen Griffiths
University of Exeter

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references