The presidential address discrepancies between the bestphilosophical account of human rights and the international law of human rights

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):1–28 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The best philosophical account of human rights regards them as protections of the values we attach to human agency. The international law of human rights is embodied in a large number of declarations, conventions, covenants, charters, and judicial decisions. There are many discrepancies between the lists of human rights that emerge from these two authoritative sources. This lecture explores the significance of these discrepancies

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Griffin on Human Rights.Roger Crisp (ed.) - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Global values in a changing world.Sonja Zweegers & Afke De Groot (eds.) - 2012 - Amsterdam: KIT Publishers.
Human Rights: Moral or Political?Adam Etinson - 2018 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#89,047)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Public Health or Clinical Ethics: Thinking beyond Borders.Onora O'Neill - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 16 (2):35-45.
Resolving interpretive conflicts in international human rights law.Kristen Hessler - 2005 - Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (1):29–52.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references