On the Relationship Between the Aretaic and the Deontic

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):493-501 (2011)
Abstract
There are two fundamental classes of terms traditionally distinguished within moral vocabulary: the deontic and the aretaic. The terms from the first set serve in the prescriptive function of a moral code. The second class contains terms used for a moral evaluation of an action. The problem of the relationship between the aretaic and the deontic has not been discussed often by philosophers. It is, however, a very important and interesting issue: any normative ethical theory which takes as basic one set of these concepts should justify such choice and establish, at least implicitly, the logical relation with the other set. This paper is organized around the criticism of Stocker’s ‘sameness thesis’ (Stocker 1973 ): the claim that ‘good’ or ‘right’ mean the same thing. It is first presented in Stocker’s own formulation and criticized as implausible in that form. Some friendly modifications to his idea are suggested and then further discussed with the skeptical conclusion: no matter how close we bring deontic and aretaic notions, the gap between them will remain and any attempt to define or even explain one set of terms in another will leave something behind
Keywords Ethics  Virtue ethics  Moral theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-010-9258-3
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,165
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Language of Morals.R. M. Hare - 1952 - Oxford Clarendon Press.
The Right and the Good.W. D. Ross - 1930 - Clarendon Press.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1874 - Thoemmes Press.
From Morality to Virtue.Michael A. Slote - 1992 - Oxford University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Toward a Framework for Agency, Inevitability, Praise and Blame.Paul McNamara - 2000 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):135-159.
Rightness and Goodness in Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.Liezl van Zyl - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:103-114.
The Relevance of an Aretaic Model in Business Ethics.Joanna G. Patsioti - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:175-180.
Agency and Deontic Logic.John Francis Horty - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
A Logical Typology of Normative Systems.Berislav Žarnić - 2010 - Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy 2 (1):30-40.
Situationist Deontic Logic.Sven Ove Hansson - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):423-448.
On Deontic Logic.Leon Gumański - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (1):63 - 75.
Deontic Norms, Deontic Reasoning, and Deontic Conditionals.Sieghard Beller - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):305 – 341.
Meinong on the Foundations of Deontic Logic.Seppo Sajama - 1988 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 32:69-81.
An Extension of the Deontic Calculus DSC.Leon Gumański - 1983 - Studia Logica 42 (2-3):129 - 137.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-02

Total downloads

131 ( #36,714 of 2,172,022 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #76,112 of 2,172,022 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums