Professor and Thaddaeus metaphysical dialogue - from the metaphysical to the physical relationship between the metaphysical
Abstract
This article is based on literary dialogue written, sincere desire to depict two true friends the history of ideas. Four decades to ponder our human and Christian existence in nature and fundamental problems. We call him: the idea from a more static model of the gradual shift from "physical metaphysics" Towards a complementary, more dynamic model of thinking, we call him "the relationship metaphysics." Over the years, try to search and insight, this is not a model selection problem of this or that, but think about the two kinds of model complement each other really close to know the real world; this understanding, there are two sources, namely: the insight into the human mind inherent ability, as well as to accept in faith the light of divine revelation. Thaddaeus gradually learn to teach a more dynamic way to express what he thought of the "cosmic benevolence" . The author of this dialogue is based on the idea phase flow academia today, further to play the so-called "relationship metaphysics", the "physical metaphysics" of the metaphysics of necessary and complementary model. This article, written in the literary form of a dialogue, intends to portray the real thought-history of two genuine friends. The forty years of reflection on esssential and basic questions of our human and Christian existence, moved gradually from a more static paradigm of thought, which we call the 'metaphysics of substance', towards a complementary and more dynamic paradigm of thought, which we call the 'metaphysics of relation'. In a years long searching effort of reflection the promising insight surfaced, that it is not a question of chosing this or that paradigm, but rather to consider the two paradigms as complementary approaches to reality as such, known by the human mind due to its inner capacity for insight, and by divine revelation accepted in faith. Professor Hang gradually learned to express his more dynamic pattern of thinking with the category of the 'cosmic ren', whereas the author of this dialogue tries to unfold the 'metaphysics of relation' against the background of modern thought in the world of sciences, understood as a necessary and complementary metaphysical paradigm to the metaphysics of substance