Agriculture and Human Values 33 (3):575-585 (2016)

Abstract
In March of 2012, following a robust activist campaign, Arysta LifeScience withdrew the soil fumigant methyl iodide from the US market, just a little over a year after it had finally been registered for use in California. As a major part of the campaign against registration of the chemical, over 53,000 people, ostensibly acting as citizens rather than consumers, wrote public comments contesting the use of the chemical for its high toxicity. Although these comments had marginal impact on the outcome of the case, these comments are of interest for what they say about public action at a time when efforts to address food and agricultural issues have been dominated by “voting with your fork.” Based on a qualitative textual analysis of approximately 3500 representative comments made available to us, we show that many of those taking action did not abandon consumer subjectivities associated with neoliberal governmentality. By threatening “personal boycotts,” some were acting in their capacity as individual consumers; in invoking their own and their children’s health many more were also acting on behalf of consumers, despite that the chemical in question is applied before strawberries are planted and thus leaves no residues. The emphasis that letter writers gave to their own bodies reinforces the idea that some bodies count more than others and thus reveals a biopolitical sorting. Having consumer lives matter is consequential in light of evidence that consumer concern about pesticides has historically led to formulations and regulations more protective of consumers than workers and neighbors.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10460-015-9626-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,343
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Impossibility of an Ethical Consumer.Jerker Karlsson - 2013 - Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Consumer Ethics Research: Reframing the Debate About Consumption for Good.Johannes Brinkmann & Ken Peattie - 2008 - Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 13 (1):22-31.
Interview.Roberto Esposito & Anna Paparcone - 2006 - Diacritics 36 (2):49-56.
Looking at Consumer Behavior in a Moral Perspective.Johannes Brinkmann - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):129-141.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-03

Total views
28 ( #388,126 of 2,445,323 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,173 of 2,445,323 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes