History of European Ideas 42 (1):1-21 (2016)
Abstract |
SummaryTracing the international career of the 1776 Virginia Declaration of Rights to Sweden via France, this article is a study in the translation of politics and the politics of translation. Specifically, it shows how the Swedish translator, physician and publisher Lorents Münter Philipson reached for it in 1792 to add to domestic arguments against hereditary office, the purpose of which, the article argues, was to revive and legitimise a more indigenous but by now slumbering rights revolution. The article first outlines the reception of America in Sweden and the ways in which Sweden figured in American debates. It then provides a detailed analysis of the trial that ensued as a response to the Swedish translation of the Virginia Declaration. Having reconstructed the process of transmission and the trial, during which the translator was charged with attacking Sweden's monarchical constitution by means of ‘wrongly’ translating the term ‘magistrate’, the article places the translation of the declaration in political context. The contextual analysis shows that translating the declaration at this particular point in time makes most sense against the background of the events unfolding in revolutionary France, which the translator hoped would influence political developments in Sweden and which the authorities sought to suppress.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1080/01916599.2015.1059035 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Universal Declaration’s Problematic Rights Justification.Georges Alexandre Lenferna - 2012 - South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):314-327.
More Considerations on Post-Trial Obligations in the Declaration of Helsinki 2013.Ignacio Mastroleo - manuscript
Reflections of an Anti-Patriarchal Declaration of Women's Human Rights.Hannelore Schröder - 1994 - History of European Ideas 19 (4-6):741-750.
Human Rights From the Nuremberg Doctors Trial to the Geneva Declaration. Persons and Institutions in Medical Ethics and History.Andreas Frewer - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (3):259-268.
Human Rights as a Fundament of Bioethics.Veronika Hulová - 2013 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 3 (3-4):117-126.
The Ambiguity of the Term 'Culture' and its Consequences for the Protection of Human Rights.Nermin Gedik - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:33-36.
The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a Corporate Code of Conduct.Peter Frankental - 2002 - Business Ethics 11 (2):129–133.
International Business, Human Rights, and Moral Complicity: A Call for a Declaration on the Universal Rights and Duties of Business.Robert E. Mcnulty W. Michael Hoffman - 2009 - Business and Society Review 114 (4):541-570.
Origins of the Universal Declaration of Animal Rights.Jean-Claude Nouët - 1998 - In Georges Chapouthier & Jean-Claude Nouët (eds.), The Universal Declaration of Animal Rights: Comments and Intentions. Ligue Française des Droits De L'animal.
Creating a New Declaration of Rights : A Critical Reconstruction of Earth Jurisprudence's Global Legislative Framework.Georges Alexandre Lenferna - unknown
Whose Dignity? Resolving Ambiguities in the Scope of "Human Dignity" in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.H. Schmidt - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (10):578-584.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-09-01
Total views
13 ( #712,361 of 2,404,067 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #360,240 of 2,404,067 )
2015-09-01
Total views
13 ( #712,361 of 2,404,067 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #360,240 of 2,404,067 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads