The Emergent Environment and the Problem of Cosmic Purpose

Environmental Ethics 8 (2):139-150 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gur general vision of the world will undoubtedly affect our environmental ethics. Scientific materialism is the “general vision” that undergirds many scholarly and popular presentations of science today. It is questionable whether this materialist metaphysics can consistently sustain an environmental concern. If scientists influenced by the materialistic outlook, nonetheless, happen to be environmentalists, itis in spite of and not because of their materialist philosophies of nature. What we need, therefore, is a cosmological vision that is nlore consistently supportive of an environmental ethic. Religious visions are often ambiguous in their attitude toward the natural environment. Alfred North Whitehead and his followers weave modem science, philosophical sophistication and religious cosmology into a metaphysical vision fully and consistently supportive of a vigorous environmental ethic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Environmental visions: Deleuze and the modalities of nature.Mark Halsey - 2004 - Ethics and the Environment 9 (2):33-64.
Jefferson’s Land Ethic.Michaelle L. Browers - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (1):43-57.
The Case for Environmental Morality.Thomas Heyd - 2003 - Environmental Ethics 25 (1):5-24.
There is no such thing as environmental ethics.P. Aarne Vesilind - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3):307-318.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
17 (#867,741)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references