A Problem for Hofweber’s Ontological Project

Philosophia 43 (3):843-846 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas Hofweber's well-known ontological project crucially involves inferring negative existential statements from statements of non-reference, i.e. statements that say that some term or terms do not refer. Here, after explaining the context of this move, I aim to show that it is fallacious, and that this vitiates Hofweber's ontological project.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Defusing easy arguments for numbers.Brendan Balcerak Jackson - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (6):447-461.
Language, Ontology, and Metaphysics.Karen Bennett - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2):466-473.
Hofweber’s Nominalist Naturalism.Eric Snyder, Richard Samuels & Stewart Shapiro - 2022 - In Gianluigi Oliveri, Claudio Ternullo & Stefano Boscolo (eds.), Objects, Structures, and Logics. Cham (Switzerland): Springer. pp. 31-62.
Ontological Trivialism?Seyed N. Mousavian - forthcoming - New Content is Available for Grazer Philosophische Studien.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-02

Downloads
793 (#26,248)

6 months
80 (#73,963)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tristan Grøtvedt Haze
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ambitious, yet modest, metaphysics.Thomas Hofweber - 2009 - In Ryan Wasserman, David Manley & David Chalmers (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 260--289.
Number determiners, numbers, and arithmetic.Thomas Hofweber - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (2):179-225.
A puzzle about ontology.Thomas Hofweber - 2005 - Noûs 39 (2):256–283.

Add more references