Interpretation Problem of Secondary Principles from Mill’s Utilitarianism -Focused on Justification by Act-utilitarianism of D. O. Brink and Crisp-

Journal of Ethics: The Korean Association of Ethics 1 (97):69-95 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Henry Sidgwick on Justification of Utilitarianism and The Method of Reflective Equilibrium.Kim Il Soo - 2019 - Journal of Ethics: The Korean Association of Ethics 1 (125):153-170.
Mill's progressive principles.David Owen Brink - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Right-Based Criticisms of Utilitarianism and The Response Strategies of Utilitarianism.Jihan Lyou - 2008 - Journal of Ethics: The Korean Association of Ethics 1 (70):1-29.
Mill’s Progressive Principles.David O. Brink - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press UK.
Mill’s Moral Standard.Ben Eggleston - 2016 - In Christopher Macleod & Dale E. Miller (eds.), A Companion to Mill. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 358-373.
Moral Role of ‘Motives’ in Utilitarianism.Nam Kyol Heo - 2013 - Journal of Ethics: The Korean Association of Ethics 1 (91):57-80.
Utilitarianism: Theory of Value.Wendy Donner & Richard Fumerton - 2009-01-02 - In Steven Nadler (ed.), Mill. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 13–32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
24 (#678,525)

6 months
4 (#863,607)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references