Organisms and their bodies: Response to LaPorte

Mind 118 (471):803-809 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that a corpse cannot be identified with an earlier living body, because it acquires and retains parts in different ways. Contrary to what Joseph LaPorte maintains, there can be neither one principle of part-assimilation nor a non-disjunctive account of persistence conditions that can establish the identity of a living body and a later corpse

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-10

Downloads
43 (#361,041)

6 months
2 (#1,448,741)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David B. Hershenov
State University of New York, Buffalo

Citations of this work

Planets, pluralism, and conceptual lineage.Carl Brusse - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 53 (C):93-106.
Mandatory Autopsies and Organ Conscription.David Hershenov - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (4):367-391.
Thinking Animals or Thinking Brains?David Hershenov - 2020 - Acta Analytica 36 (1):11-24.

Add more citations