The Looping Problem

Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):216-217 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Subsystem Formation Driven by Double Contingency” by Bernd Porr & Paolo Di Prodi. Upshot: By analyzing Porr and Di Prodi’s model for addressing the double contingency problem, I try to take a step further by questioning the importance and implications of the loop concept in the constructivist approach

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aligning Homeostatic and Heterostatic Perspectives.P. M. Pilarski - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):213-215.
Learning by Experiencing versus Learning by Registering.O. L. Georgeon - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):211-213.
Communication Without Emergence?T. Kron & P. Berger - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):112-114.
On Plasticity and Granularity in Artificial Life Models.Elio Tuci - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):292-293.
Subsystem Formation Driven by Double Contingency.Bernd Porr & Paolo Di Prodi - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):199-211.
Society as Constructed Ontology?F. Grote - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):217-218.
New Concepts or Just Re-Wording?Filipo Studzinski Perotto - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):293-295.
Entropy as a Resource for Double Contingency.F. Grote - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):58-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-15

Downloads
22 (#733,560)

6 months
22 (#129,165)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references