Synthese 192 (4):1-28 (2015)

Authors
Risto Hilpinen
University of Miami
Abstract
In his Logical Investigations Edmund Husserl criticizes John Stuart Mill’s account of meaning as connotation, especially Mill’s failure to separate the distinction between connotative and non-connotative names from the distinction between the meaningful and the meaningless. According to Husserl, both connotative and non-connotative names have meaning or “signification”, that is, what Gottlob Frege calls the sense (“Sinn”) of an expression. The distinction between connotative and non-connotative names is a distinction between two kinds of meaning (or sense), attributive and non-attributive meaning (“attributive und nicht-attributive Bedeutung”). Attributive (connotative) names denote (refer to) objects through their attributes, whereas a non-attributive name means a thing directly (“direkt”). In this paper I examine the concepts of attributive and non-attributive meaning by means of the semiotic theory of Charles S. Peirce, and compare Peirce’s account with the views of Frege, Husserl, Alexius Meinong, and David Kaplan and Gareth Evans
Keywords Conception  Frege  Interpretant  Name  Object  Peirce  Sense  Sign
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2015
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-013-0326-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,688
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Harvard University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Languages of Art.Nelson Goodman - 1968 - Bobbs-Merrill.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Frege’s Distinction Between Sense and Reference.Gideon Makin - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (2):147-163.
Names, Sense and Kripke’s Puzzle.Tim Crane - 1992 - From the Logical Point of View 2:11-26.
Sense and Objectivity in Frege's Logic.Gilead Bar-Elli - 2001 - In Albert Newen (ed.), Building on Frege. Stanford: pp. 91-111.
I. Frege as a Realist.Michael Dummett - 1976 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):455-468.
Meinong’s Theory of Sense and Reference.Peter Simons - 1995 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 50 (1):171-186.
Sense and Reference: The Origins and Development of the Distinction.Michael Kremer - 2010 - In Tom Ricketts & Michael D. Potter (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Frege. Cambridge University Press. pp. 220--292.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-20

Total views
44 ( #219,022 of 2,349,550 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,673 of 2,349,550 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes