- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Slippery Slopes and Other Consequences
Logic and Logical Philosophy (forthcoming)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Logiczne i empiryczne równie pochyłe.Krzysztof A. Wieczorek - 2012 - Folia Philosophica 30:239--258.
Slippery Slopes to Slippery Slopes: Therapeutic Cloning and the Criminal Law.Russell Blackford - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):63-64.
The Hidden Logic of Slippery Slope Arguments.Dale Jacquette - 1989 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 22 (1):59 - 70.
Which Slopes are Slippery?Bernard Williams - 1995 - In Making Sense of Humanity: And Other Philosophical Papers 1982–1993. New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Slippery Slope Argument.Govert den Hartogh - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 321–332.
Historical Analogies, Slippery Slopes, and the Question of Euthanasia.Walter Wright - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (2):176-186.
The ‘Slippery Slope’ argument: Uses and misuses: Miller Slippery slopes.Arthur Miller - 2007 - Think 5 (14):43-50.
Slippery Slopes and Moral Reasoning.Raymond J. Devettere - 1992 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 3 (4):297-301.
What's Wrong with Slippery Slope Arguments?Trudy Govier - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):303 - 316.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-10-25
Downloads
25 (#621,327)
6 months
9 (#436,568)
2017-10-25
Downloads
25 (#621,327)
6 months
9 (#436,568)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation.Martin Hinton - 2020 - Argumentation 35 (3):435-455.
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-sqlzn uwo