Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:102-112 (2008)
This paper examines how competition and competitive strategy influence companies’ propensity to engage in socially and environmentally responsible procurement processes (SERP). We interview 141 British procurement managers, on their perception of their company’s competitive strategy and the competitive environment in which they operating in. In addition, participants were asked how important responsible procurement was for their overall business and their strategy.Our results suggest that companies that produce a differentiated product engage in relatively proactive SERP process, compared to their counterparties, who aimed to produce a product at the lowest price possible
|Keywords||Business and Professional Ethics Conference Proceedings Social Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Effect of Isomorphic Pressure on Socially and Environmentally Responsible Procurement in the United Kingdom.Adam Adrien-Kirby, Stephen Brammer & Andrew Millington - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:93-101.
Industry Life Cycle and Responsible Procurement.Stefan Hoejmose, Stephen Brammer & Andrew Millington - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:133-145.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Socially and Environmentally Sustainable Procurement Practices in the Public and Private Sectors.Charles Oldroyd, Johanne Grosvold & Andrew Millington - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:391-396.
Public Versus Private Sector Procurement Ethics and Strategy: What Each Sector Can Learn From the Other. [REVIEW]Timothy G. Hawkins, Michael J. Gravier & Edward H. Powley - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (4):567-586.
Moral Schemas and Corruption in Ugandan Public Procurement.Joseph Mpeera Ntayi, Pascal Ngoboka & Cornelia Sabiiti Kakooza - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (3):417-436.
Socially Responsible High Tech Companies: Emerging Issues. [REVIEW]Barbara Krumsiek - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):179 - 187.
Socially Responsible Investing: A Critical Appraisal. [REVIEW]D. Bruce Johnsen - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):219 - 222.
Socially Responsible Investing in the United States.Steve Schueth - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):189 - 194.
Understanding Socially Responsible Investing: The Effect of Decision Frames and Trade-Off Options. [REVIEW]Katherina Glac - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):41 - 55.
Exploring the Interface Between Strategy-Making and Responsible Leadership.Rachel Maritz, Marius Pretorius & Kato Plant - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (S1):101-113.
Do Non-Socially Responsible Companies Achieve Legitimacy Through Socially Responsible Actions? The Mediating Effect of Innovation.Belen Blanco, Encarna Guillamón-Saorín & Andrés Guiral - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (1):67-83.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads17 ( #278,905 of 2,153,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?