Bell's Theorem, Ideology, and Structural Explanation

In James T. Cushing & Ernan McMullin (eds.), Philoophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. University of Notre Dame Press. pp. 195--207 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bell's Theorem: A Guide to the Implications.Jon P. Jarrett - 1989 - In James T. Cushing & Ernan McMullin (eds.), Philoophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. University of Notre Dame Press. pp. 60--79.
Do Correlations Need to be Explained?Arthur Fine - 1989 - In James T. Cushing & Ernan McMullin (eds.), Philoophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. University of Notre Dame Press. pp. 175--194.
Holism, Separability, and the Metaphysical Implications of the Bell Experiments.Don Howard - 1989 - In James T. Cushing & Ernan McMullin (eds.), Philoophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. University of Notre Dame Press. pp. 224--253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
2 (#1,450,151)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

How scientific models can explain.Alisa Bokulich - 2011 - Synthese 180 (1):33 - 45.
Can classical structures explain quantum phenomena?Alisa Bokulich - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2):217-235.
The Non-mechanistic Option: Defending Dynamical Explanations.Russell Meyer - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (3):959-985.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references