The International Labor Organization in the Stag Hunt for Global Labor Rights

Law and Ethics of Human Rights 3 (2):154-179 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The International Labor Organization is not an effective force for raising labor standards in the developing world and could become considerably more effective by taking account of two of the most important and interrelated recent theoretical developments in understanding labor standards. First, countries derive no comparative advantage in the global trading system from most very low labor standards. The ILO should therefore concentrate its energies on lifting these, rather than concentrating on labor standards that are a source of comparative advantage, the elimination of which is resisted strongly and effectively. Second, the tools of game theory may be used to identify the collective action problems that prevent countries from lifting their own labor standards, and create a role for a transnational agency that may assist them

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sweatshops, labor rights, and comparative advantage.Gary Chartier - 2008 - Oregon Review of International Law 10 (1):149--188.
Corporate Codes of Conduct.James K. Rowe & Ronnie D. Lipschutz - 2005 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:65-78.
Corporate Codes of Conduct.Ian Maitland - 2005 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:65-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
35 (#445,023)

6 months
3 (#1,207,210)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references