Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2) (1991)
In this paper three questions concerning quality of life in medicine and health care are analysed and discussed: the motives for measuring the quality of life, the methods used in assessing it, and the definition of the concept. The purposes of the study are to find an ethically acceptable motive for measuring the quality of life; to identify the methodological advantages and disadvantages of the most prevalent current methods of measurement; and to present an approach towards measuring and defining the quality of life which evades the difficulties encountered and discussed. The analysis comprises measurements both in the clinical situation concerning individual patients and in research concerning whole populations.Three motives are found for evaluating the quality of human life: allocation of scarce medical resources, facilitating clinical decision making, and assisting patients towards autonomous decision making. It is argued that the third alternative is the only one which does not evoke ethical problems.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Felicitometry: Measuring the 'Quality' in Quality of Life.Charles Kowalski, Steven Pennell & Amiram Vinokur - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (6):307–313.
Quality of Life Assessment and Human Dignity: Against the Incompatibility-Assumption.Michael Quante - 2005 - Poiesis and Praxis 3 (3):168-180.
Quality of Life - Three Competing Views.Peter Sondøe - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):11-23.
The Sanctity-of-Life Doctrine in Medicine: A Critique.Helga Kuhse - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Quality-of-Life Considerations in Substitute Decision-Making for Severely Disabled Neonates: The Problem of Developing Awareness.Eike-Henner W. Kluge - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (5):351-366.
Explaining Amoral Decision Making: An External View of a Human Disaster. [REVIEW]Richard J. McKenna - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (6):681 - 694.
Can Life Be Evaluated? The Jewish Halachic Approach Vs. The Quality of Life Approach in Medical Ethics: A Critical View.Raphael Cohen-Almagor & Merav Shmueli - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (2):117-137.
Principles and Problems in the Assessment of Quality of Life in Health Care.Ray Fitzpatrick - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):37-46.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #95,772 of 2,171,910 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,896 of 2,171,910 )
How can I increase my downloads?