Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):393-408 (1995)
I defend in this essay the seemingly uncontroversial thesis that God is just. By highlighting the kenotic nature of God’s essential goodness, I rebut arguments by Marilyn Adams, Thomas Morris, and William Alston to the effect that God is too sublime to be bound by obligations to creatures. A straightforward acknowledgement that the God who is Love has freely chosen to be (not merely seem) just, is required by fidelity to Scripture as well as by religious experience. Thus is Christianity’s incarnational faith unHellenized ... again
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him.Charles Billingsley - 2009 - Regal Books.
God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him.Elmer L. Towns - 2009 - Regal Books.
The Fidelity of Betrayal: Towards a Church Beyond Belief.Peter Rollins - 2008 - Paraclete Press.
God's Moral Goodness and Supererogation.Drummond Young Elizabeth - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):83-95.
Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience.William P. Alston - 1991 - Cornell University Press.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads19 ( #253,636 of 2,152,493 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,782 of 2,152,493 )
How can I increase my downloads?