Hypatia 11 (3):24 - 46 (1996)
The noted psychologist, Doreen Kimura, has argued that we should not expect to find equal numbers of men and women in various professions because there is a natural sexual inequality of intellect. In rebuttal I argue that each of these mutually supporting theses is insufficiently supported by the evidence to be accepted. The social and ethical dimensions of Kimura's work, and of the scientific study of the nature-nurture controversy in general, are briefly discussed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Numerical Abstraction by Human Infants.Prentice Starkey, Elizabeth S. Spelke & Rochel Gelman - 1990 - Cognition 36 (2):97-127.
The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.
Sexual Selection and Sex Differences in Mathematical Abilities.David C. Geary - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):229.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Is Inequality Bad for Our Health?Jeffrey D. Milyo & Jennifer M. Mellor - 1999 - Critical Review 13 (3-4):359-372.
Discrimination, Harassment, and the Glass Ceiling: Women Executives as Change Agents. [REVIEW]P. Bell Myrtle, E. Mclaughlin Mary & M. Sequeira Jennifer - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):65 - 76.
Implementing Business Ethics: Sexual Harassment. [REVIEW]Karen A. Crain & Kenneth A. Heischmidt - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (4):299 - 308.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads26 ( #192,204 of 2,154,092 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,759 of 2,154,092 )
How can I increase my downloads?