R. A. Fisher: a faith fit for eugenics

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (1):110-135 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In discussions of ‘religion-and-science’, faith is usually emphasized more than works, scientists’ beliefs more than their deeds. By reversing the priority, a lingering puzzle in the life of Ronald Aylmer Fisher , statistician, eugenicist and founder of the neo-Darwinian synthesis, can be solved. Scholars have struggled to find coherence in Fisher’s simultaneous commitment to Darwinism, Anglican Christianity and eugenics. The problem is addressed by asking what practical mode of faith or faithful mode of practice lent unity to his life? Families, it is argued, with their myriad practical, emotional and intellectual challenges, rendered a mathematically-based eugenic Darwinian Christianity not just possible for Fisher, but vital

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

R. A. Fisher: a faith fit for eugenics.James Moore - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (1):110-135.
R. A. Fisher: a faith fit for eugenics.James Moore - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (1):110-135.
Ronald A. Fisher and the improvement of humankind.Stefan Bovolon Bovolon - 2018 - Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science 22:50-68.
Statistics is not enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's experimental results (1866).Avital Pilpel - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):618-626.
What was Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection and what was it for?Anya Plutynski - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (1):59-82.
The origins of the stochastic theory of population genetics: The Wright-Fisher model.Yoichi Ishida & Alirio Rosales - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 79 (C):101226.
What was Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection and what was it for?Anya Plutynski - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (1):59-82.
What was Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection and what was it for?Anya Plutynski - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (1):59-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
73 (#220,510)

6 months
13 (#276,301)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Utopianism in the British evolutionary synthesis.Maurizio Esposito - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):40-49.
R.A. Fisher, indeterminism, and the fundamental theorem of natural selection.Brian McLoone - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 105 (C):120-125.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.Charles Darwin - 1898 - New York: Plume. Edited by Carl Zimmer.
Deconstructing Darwinism: The politics of evolution in the 1860s.James Moore - 1991 - Journal of the History of Biology 24 (3):353-408.
Introduction. Moore - 1992 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 67 (4):363-365.

View all 9 references / Add more references