Communication in philosophy

Philosophy of Science 14 (2):164-170 (1947)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the ultimate analysis, all philosophical differences are verbal. If by some intellectual X-Ray we could see into the minds of others, and perceive the exact nature of their concepts, we should be force to concede the correctness of their conclusions. The only alternative is that the mental processes—the laws of thought—differ from individual to individual.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rhetoric and communication in philosophy.Henry Johnstone - 1970 - In Howard Evans Kiefer & Milton Karl Munitz (eds.), Perspectives in Education, Religion, and the Arts. Albany, State University of New York Press. pp. 351--364.
Inter-communication in philosophy.Theodore T. Lafferty - 1946 - Journal of Philosophy 43 (17):449-466.
On Forms of Communication In Philosophy.Barry Smith - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:73-82.
The Logic of Communication Between Philosophy and Psychology.Raymond J. Mccall - 1952 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 26:83.
The Logic of Communication Between Philosophy and Psychology: Comment.John W. Stafford - 1952 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 26:90.
In Defense of Laws.John Earman - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (2):413-419.
The myth of the hidden.William E. S. McNeill - 2009 - Dissertation, University College London

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
15 (#975,286)

6 months
1 (#1,516,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references