Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations

Human Nature 4 (3):271-296 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The theory of sexual selection suggests several possible explanations for the development of standards of physical attractiveness in humans. Asymmetry and departures from average proportions may be markers of the breakdown of developmental stability. Supernormal traits may present age- and sex-typical features in exaggerated form. Evidence from social psychology suggests that both average proportions and (in females) “neotenous” facial traits are indeed more attractive. Using facial photographs from three populations (United States, Brazil, Paraguayan Indians), rated by members of the same three populations, plus Russians and Venezuelan Indians, we show that age, average features, and (in females) feminine/neotenous features all play a role in facial attractiveness

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human Facial Beauty.Randy Thornhill & Steven W. Gangestad - 1993 - Human Nature 4 (3):237-269.
Mate Choice Copying in Humans.D. Waynforth - 2007 - Human Nature 18 (3):264-271.
The “Beauty Myth” Is No Myth.Jonathan Gottschall - 2008 - Human Nature 19 (2):174-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
39 (#297,219)

6 months
2 (#278,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?