Pre-Ch 'in Confucian and Legalist Thought is Fundamentally Antagonistic'

Contemporary Chinese Thought 7 (4):4-20 (1976)
Throughout Chinese history, the Legalists and the Confucians have always been antagonistic schools of thought. The idea that the Legalists have their origins in the Confucians, that they are the successors of the Confucians, is nonsense. Explaining the problem and clarifying the class nature of the Confucian-Legalist struggle has important and real significance for deepening the Campaign to Criticize Lin Piao and Confucius, for criticizing the reactionary thought of honoring Confucius and opposing Legalism, and for grasping class struggle in the realm of ideology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2753/CSP1097-146707044
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,470
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Weixi Hu (2007). On Confucian Communitarianism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):475-487.
T'ang Hsiao-Wen (1976). Why is Hsün Tzu Called A Legalist? Contemporary Chinese Thought 8 (1):21-35.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

9 ( #439,906 of 1,925,574 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #308,518 of 1,925,574 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.