On the Issue of the Liar Antinomy

Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 25:21-26 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I justify a non-logician speaking of the liar antinomy by Peano view that semantic antinomies are linguistic issues. The remarks I formulate below follow Alfred Gawroński’s idea, namely, that the liar antinomy is an apparent antinomy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Antinomy of the Liar.A. Dumitriu - 1980 - International Logic Review 22:107.
On Cervantes’ Antinomy.Jerzy Kalinowski - 1978 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 8:62-70.
Leibniz's law and the antinomy of the liar.Vito F. Sinisi - 1969 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (2):279-289.
On Paradoxes and Situational Context Analysis.Marek Magdziak - 2004 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 25:27-44.
Intensional Liar.Keota Fields - 2017 - Philosophical Topics 45 (2):21-32.
Kearns' Illocutionary Logic and the Liar.Manuel Bremer - 2008 - History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (3):223-225.
Skeptical essays.Benson Mates - 1981 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-10

Downloads
3 (#1,728,269)

6 months
2 (#1,259,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Outline of a theory of truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
Notes on naive semantics.Hans Herzberger - 1982 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1):61 - 102.

Add more references