Abstract

This book is the first systematic study of Neo-Platonist philosopher Proclus theory of the bad. Examining Proclus overall system demonstrates that his critique of Plotinus attribution of all ill to the material is cogent. Moreover, a comparison between Proclus and Plato shows that the Proclus theory of the ethical bad can be plausibly construed as an interpretation of Plato s theory of action. Finally, examining the similarities between Dionysius Areopagita s theory of the bad and Proclus preceding theory allows one to discern which elements of Dionysius view are of his own creation and which are borrowed from his predecessors. "