Tit for tat for tit: On reactive loops and regresses

Analysis 83 (1):55-60 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

First, a story

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/anac032

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Tit-for-Tat.Massimo Pigliucci - 2001 - Philosophy Now 33:28-29.
The maladroitness of epistemic tit for tat.John Woods - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (6):324-331.
The repeated public goods game: A solution using Tit-for-Tat and the Lindahl point.Mark Irving Lichbach - 1992 - Theory and Decision 32 (2):133-146.
The Maladroitness of Epistemic Tit for Tat.John Woods - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (6):324.
The moral and ethical significance of tit for tat.Peter Danielson - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (3):449-.
Epistemic tit for tat.Michel J. Blais - 1987 - Journal of Philosophy 84 (7):363-375.
Cosmic evolution, reciprocity, and interstellar tit for tat.Albert A. Harrison - 2014 - In Douglas A. Vakoch (ed.), Extraterrestrial altruism: evolution and ethics in the cosmos. New York: Springer.
Epistemic Tit for Tat.Michel J. Blais - 1987 - Journal of Philosophy 84 (7):363.
Gaps in Harley's argument on evolutionarily stable learning rules and in the logic of “tit for tat”.Reinhard Selten & Peter Hammerstein - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):115.
Misunderstandings of Epistemic Tit for Tat: Reply to John Woods.Michel J. Blais - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (7):369.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-25

Downloads
65 (#243,015)

6 months
5 (#836,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Kearns
Florida State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Why Believe in Normative Supervenience?Debbie Roberts - 2018 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 13.
Semantic Sovereignty.Stephen Kearns & Ofra Magidor - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):322-350.
Explaining causal loops.U. Meyer - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):259-264.

Add more references