Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 131 (1-3):227-261 (2005)
Abstract |
The main topic of this paper is the investigation of generalized amalgamation properties for simple theories. That is, we are trying to answer the question of when a simple theory has the property of n-dimensional amalgamation, where two-dimensional amalgamation is the Independence Theorem for simple theories. We develop the notions of strong n-simplicity and n-simplicity for 1≤n≤ω, where both “1-simple” and “strongly 1-simple” are the same as “simple”. For strong n-simplicity, we present examples of simple unstable theories in each subclass and prove a characteristic property of strong n-simplicity in terms of strong n-dividing, a strengthening of the dependence relation called dividing in simple theories. We prove a strong three-dimensional amalgamation property for strongly 2-simple theories, and, under an additional assumption, a strong -dimensional amalgamation property for strongly n-simple theories. In the last section of the paper we comment on why strong n-simplicity is called strong
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1016/j.apal.2004.06.001 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Simple Theories.Byunghan Kim & Anand Pillay - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 88 (2):149-164.
A Primer of Simple Theories.Rami Grossberg, José Iovino & Olivier Lessmann - 2002 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 41 (6):541-580.
Lascar Strong Types in Some Simple Theories.Steven Buechler - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):817-824.
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Constructing the Hyperdefinable Group From the Group Configuration.Tristram de Piro, Byunghan Kim & Jessica Millar - 2006 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 6 (2):121-139.
Generalized Amalgamation and N -Simplicity.Byunghan Kim, Alexei S. Kolesnikov & Akito Tsuboi - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 155 (2):97-114.
Failure of N -Uniqueness: A Family of Examples.Elisabetta Pastori & Pablo Spiga - 2011 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 57 (2):133-148.
Independence and the Finite Submodel Property.Vera Koponen - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 158 (1-2):58-79.
Similar books and articles
Definability and Definable Groups in Simple Theories.Anand Pillay - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (3):788-796.
On Omega-Categorical Simple Theories.Daniel Palacín - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (7-8):709-717.
Group Configurations and Germs in Simple Theories.Itay Ben-Yaacov - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (4):1581-1600.
On Dividing Chains in Simple Theories.Steffen Lewitzka & Ruy J. G. B. De Queiroz - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (7):897-911.
Very Simple Theories Without Forking.Ludomir Newelski - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (6):601-616.
A Primer of Simple Theories.Rami Grossberg, José Iovino & Olivier Lessmann - 2002 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 41 (6):541-580.
Lascar Strong Types in Some Simple Theories.Steven Buechler - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):817-824.
Weak Dividing, Chain Conditions, and Simplicity.Alfred Dolich - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (2):265-283.
Simple Theories of a Messy World: Truth and Explanatory Power in Nonlinear Dynamics.Alexander Rueger & W. David Sharp - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):93-112.
Inconsistency Theories: The Significance of Semantic Ascent.Douglas Patterson - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (6):575-589.
Forking and Fundamental Order in Simple Theories.Daniel Lascar & Anand Pillay - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1155-1158.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-01-16
Total views
14 ( #681,126 of 2,410,273 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #149,573 of 2,410,273 )
2014-01-16
Total views
14 ( #681,126 of 2,410,273 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #149,573 of 2,410,273 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads