Two Theories of Retributive Punishment: Immanuel Kant and Thomas Aquinas

History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (4):319 - 338 (2005)

Authors
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Punishment: Consequentialism.David Wood - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
A Retributive Argument Against Punishment.Greg Roebuck & David Wood - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
The Rise and Fall of the Mixed Theory of Punishment.Whitley Kaufman - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):37-57.
Foundations of a Kantian Theory of Punishment.J. Angelo Corlett - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):263-283.
Retributive Parsimony.Richard L. Lippke - 2009 - Res Publica 15 (4):377-395.
Thomas Hobbes and the Philosophy of Punishment.Alan Norrie - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (2):299 - 320.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
27 ( #343,935 of 2,286,108 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #413,317 of 2,286,108 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature