In defence of medical ethics

Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):340-343 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A number of recent publications by the philosopher David Seedhouse are discussed. Although medicine is an eminently ethical enterprise, the technical and ethical aspects of health care practices can be distinguished, therefore justifying the existence of medical ethics and its teaching as a specific part of every medical curriculum. The goal of teaching medical ethics is to make health care practitioners aware of the essential ethical aspects of their work. Furthermore, the contention that rational bioethics is a fruitless enterprise because it analyses non-rational social events seems neither theoretically tenable nor to be borne out by actual practice. Medical ethics in particular and bioethics in general, constitute a field of expertise that must make itself understandable and convincing to relevant audiences in health care

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
45 (#96,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Miguel Kottow
Universidad de Chile

References found in this work

Against medical ethics: a response to Cassell.D. Seedhouse - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (1):13-17.
Routine neonatal circumcision: Symbol of the birth of the therapeutic state.Thomas Szasz - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):137-148.
Liberating Medicine.David Seedhouse - 1991 - John Wiley & Son.

Add more references